Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 368 N.E.2d 1154
  • 267 Ind. 167
  • 1977 Ind. LEXIS 478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing Fossey and holding that Rule 4(B) was available to a defendant incarcerated on another charge only if the defendant was in “exclusive control of the State of Indiana”
  • discussing Fossey and holding that Rule 4(B) was available to a defendant incarcerated on another charge only if the defendant was in \exclusive control of the State of Indiana\
  • discussing Fossey and holding that Rule 4(B) was available to a defendant incarcerated on another charge only if the defendant was in “exclusive control of the State of Indiana”
  • restating a three-factor test for determining whether, upon demand, the State has satisfied its constitutional duty to make a diligent, good-faith effort to bring a defendant incarcerated out of state to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prentice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.