Ponsetti v. GE Pension Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• calling plaintiff’s attempt to sue ERISA plan for breach of fiduciary duty under § 502(a)(1)(B) a “novel theory”
• “‘[T]he administrator must weigh the evidence for and against [the denial or termination of benefits], and within reasonable limits, the reasons for rejecting evidence must be articulated if there is to be meaningful appellate review.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).