· 12/13/2001
Susan E. Hess v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
Citations
- 274 F.3d 456
- 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1205
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26513
- 2001 WL 1587274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that sometimes “common sense will require the court to pronounce an administrator’s determination arbitrary and capricious”
- stating that a construction of a plan that ignores its plain language is unreasonable
- analogizing submission of case on administrative record to a bench trial and reviewing for clear error
- “The fact that the examiner did not bother .to read pertinent evidence actually before him cannot shield Hartford’s decision from review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Rovner, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.