Skip to main content
· 12/13/2001

Susan E. Hess v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company

Citations

  • 274 F.3d 456
  • 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1205
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26513
  • 2001 WL 1587274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that sometimes “common sense will require the court to pronounce an administrator’s determination arbitrary and capricious”
  • stating that a construction of a plan that ignores its plain language is unreasonable
  • analogizing submission of case on administrative record to a bench trial and reviewing for clear error
  • “The fact that the examiner did not bother .to read pertinent evidence actually before him cannot shield Hartford’s decision from review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Rovner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.