Plumley v. Mockett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a supplemental expert report “seeks to ‘strengthen’ or ‘deepen’ opinions expressed in the original expert report is beyond the scope of proper supplementation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mariscal v. Graco, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2014-06-26· cited 21×
• Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2013-02-11· cited 13×
• Hardisty v. Moore
  S.D. California· 2014-03-18· cited 4×

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas City
  Supreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 3,371×
• KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 1,310×
• Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-11-27· cited 937×
• Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-04-25· cited 722×
• Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-08-08· cited 637×
• Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1999-06-23· cited 590×
• A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.
  Federal Circuit· 1992-05-19· cited 585×
• Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of California
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-07· cited 317×
• The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1991-09-09· cited 287×
• The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and Company
  Federal Circuit· 1997-10-24· cited 260×
• Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1993-01-26· cited 253×
• Finisar Corp. v. DirecTV Group, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-04-18· cited 248×
• Torres v. City of Los Angeles
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-11-12· cited 236×
• Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-Appellants
  Federal Circuit· 1991-09-13· cited 212×
• DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-06-01· cited 180×
• Digital Control v. The Charles MacHine Works (Also Known as Ditchwitch)
  Federal Circuit· 2006-02-08· cited 180×
• Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-06-03· cited 174×
• Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-05-13· cited 168×