Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that inventor’s unwitnessed notebook was not adequate corroborating evidence of an earlier invention date
• requiring corroboration where patentee tried to prove that the conception date was earlier than the filing date of a 2009-1504 17 potentially anticipatory patent
• requiring corroboration where patentee tried to prove that the conception date was earlier than the filing date of a 2009-1504 17 potentially anticipatory patent
• describing positional isomers as \contain[ing] the same atoms arranged in different ways\
• describing positional isomers as “contain[ing] the same atoms arranged in different ways”
• describing positional isomers as \contain[ing] the same atoms arranged in different ways\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).