Skip to main content
· 9/9/1991

The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.

Citations

  • 939 F.2d 1533
  • 1991 WL 119626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that different claims should be construed, when possible, to cover different inventions
  • “[T]he failure to meet a single limitation is sufficient to negate infringement of the claim.”
  • “To establish infringement, every limitation set forth in a patent claim-must be found in an accused product .... ”
  • literal infringement requires that the accused device or process contains every limitation of the asserted claim
  • “Absent section 112(6), claim language which requires only a means for performing a function might be indefinite.”
  • “[t]he recited structure tells only what the means-for-joining does, not what it is structurally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nies, Rich, Clevenger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.