Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, once the moving party meets its burden, the nonmoving party is “obliged to produce evidence in response”
• noting that a moving party may carry its burden of production by 10 showing that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party’s case
• noting that a moving party may carry its burden of 21 production by showing that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party’s case
• noting that a moving party 9 may carry its burden of production by showing that there is an absence of evidence to support the 10 nonmoving party’s case
• noting that a moving party may carry its 23 burden of production by showing that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving 24 party’s case
• noting that a moving party may carry its burden of 22 production by showing that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party’s 23 case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).