Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/15/2014
Pittman v. Pittman
Citations
- 407 S.C. 141
- 754 S.E.2d 501
- 2014 WL 130497
- 2014 S.C. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the proper way to reflect one party’s disproportionately greater direct financial contribution is in the overall division of the marital estate
- \[T]ransmutation is ultimately a matter of discerning the parties' intent.\ (emphasis added)
- \Property that is nonmarital when acquired may be transmuted into marital property if it . . . is used by the parties in support of the marriage or in some other way that establishes the parties' intent to make it marital property.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Hearn, Kittredge, Pleicones, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Crossland v. CrosslandSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-07-02· cited 58×
- Brown v. OdomCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-09-19· cited 32×
- McMillan v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-13· cited 7×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-09-19· cited 4×
- Fredrickson v. SchulzeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-04-13· cited 4×
- Taylor-Cracraft v. CracraftCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-13· cited 2×
- Jordan v. PostellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-08-04
- Khalil Abbas-Ghaleb v. Anna GhalebCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-04-03
- Khalil Abbas-Ghaleb v. Anna GhalebCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-10-21
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 543×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 186×
- Jenkins v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 73×
- Eason v. EasonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-08-31· cited 55×
- Odom v. OdomAlaska Supreme Court· 2006-08-11· cited 54×
- Wilburn v. WilburnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-12-04· cited 45×
- Pirri v. PirriCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-05-22· cited 44×
- Calhoun v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-06· cited 40×
- Toler v. TolerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-05-11· cited 23×
- Peterkin v. PeterkinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-08-24· cited 19×
- Dawkins v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-01-04· cited 17×
- Trimnal v. TrimnalSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-02-05· cited 15×
- Simpson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-02-08· cited 14×
- Roberson v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-05-24· cited 13×
- Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-05-29· cited 11×
- Frank v. FrankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-04-05· cited 11×
- Edwards v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-17· cited 10×
- Wyatt v. WyattCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-10-26· cited 10×
- Canady v. CanadyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-10-31· cited 8×
- Pittman v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-10-18· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.