Eason v. Eason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the family court should reconsider the issue of attorney’s fees on remand based on the appellate court’s disposition of another issue on appeal
• \[W]aiver requires a party to have known of a right and known he was abandoning that right.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lewis v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 543×
• Burch v. Burch
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-10-31· cited 20×
• King v. James
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-04-20· cited 17×
• Sanford v. South Carolina State Ethics Commission
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-11-05· cited 16×
• Marchant v. Marchant
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-09-01· cited 15×
• Pittman v. Pittman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-01-15· cited 14×
• Osbey v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-03-06· cited 11×
• Argabright v. Argabright
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-06-20· cited 9×
• Pittman v. Pittman
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-10-18· cited 8×
• McKinney v. Pedery
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-08-26· cited 8×
• Dozier v. American Red Cross
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-09-17· cited 8×
• Biggins v. Burdette
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-03-16· cited 7×
• Fredrickson v. Schulze
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-04-13· cited 4×
• Mullarkey v. Mullarkey
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-01-25· cited 3×
• McKinney v. Pedery
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-08-14· cited 3×
• Woods v. Woods
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-27· cited 3×
• S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Wiseman
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-02-13
• Timothy Register v. Angel Dixon
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-08-03

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• E.D.M. v. T.A.M.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 274×
• Patel v. Patel
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-24· cited 145×
• Wooten v. Wooten
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-06· cited 102×
• Berkebile v. Outen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-01-11· cited 79×
• Strickland v. Strickland
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-08-27· cited 65×
• Parker v. Parker
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-04-04· cited 35×
• Degenhart v. Burriss
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-08-16· cited 26×
• Semken v. Semken
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-07-08· cited 15×
• Croom v. Croom
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-06-10· cited 14×
• Maxwell v. Maxwell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-08-24· cited 2×