Roberson v. Roberson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the family court has discretion to decide what weight to assign the various equitable apportionment factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wooten v. Wooten
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-06· cited 102×
• Wilburn v. Wilburn
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-12-04· cited 45×
• Dawkins v. Dawkins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-01-04· cited 17×
• Pittman v. Pittman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-01-15· cited 14×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Glasscock v. Glasscock
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-03-11· cited 284×
• E.D.M. v. T.A.M.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 274×
• Johnson v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 186×
• Allen v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-10-29· cited 90×
• Jenkins v. Jenkins
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 73×
• Dearybury v. Dearybury
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-26· cited 64×
• Hopkins v. Hopkins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-12-18· cited 25×
• Haselden v. Haselden
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 22×
• Bowen v. Bowen
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-07-21· cited 19×
• Bragg v. Bragg
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 17×
• Henggeler v. Hanson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-12-14· cited 17×
• Wooten v. Wooten
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-10-20· cited 5×