Skip to main content

Phelps v. State

Citations

  • 914 N.E.2d 283
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 2048
  • 2009 WL 3170540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court abused its discretion in failing to consider defendant‟s lack of criminal history as a mitigating circumstance
  • reducing sentences for vicarious sexual gratification with minors based in part on fact that multiple acts occurred during one evening
  • finding defendant waived his claim of error caused by the State’s cross-examination during allocution because he did not object at the sentencing hearing and made no claim of fundamental error
  • “Remorse, or lack thereof, by a defendant is something better guarded by a trial judge who views and hears a defendant’s apology and demeanor firsthand and determines the defendant’s credibility.”
  • “Remorse, or lack thereof, by a defendant is something better guarded by a trial judge who views and hears a defendant’s apology and demeanor first hand and determines the defendant’s credibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Baker, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.