Indiana Court of Appeals· 7/19/2011
Sharp v. State
Citations
- 951 N.E.2d 282
- 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1320
- 2011 WL 2847444
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no abuse of discretion when the trial court failed to identify the defendant’s participation in jail programs as a mitigator because the programs did not correlate to the crimes and did not address a condition for which the defendant needed rehabilitation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirsch, Mathias, Vaidik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-26· cited 1,831×
- Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-10-30· cited 1,479×
- Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-06-14· cited 1,438×
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 824×
- Davidson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2010-05-25· cited 301×
- Reid v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-11-28· cited 196×
- Sloan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-06-01· cited 78×
- Rascoe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-10-05· cited 78×
- Newsome v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-10-14· cited 72×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-09-10· cited 45×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-04-27· cited 27×
- Phelps v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-10-05· cited 20×
- Sullivan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-11-10· cited 19×
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-10-12· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.