Skip to main content

Banks v. State

Citations

  • 841 N.E.2d 654
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 160
  • 2006 WL 267170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the trial court’s failure to consider the defendant’s guilty plea as mitigating was harmless
  • defendant waived claims of error regarding the trial court’s failure to identify mitigating circumstances because defendant failed to raise them at the sentencing hearing
  • defendant waived claims of error regarding the trial court’s failure to identify mitigating circumstances because the defendant failed to raise them to the trial court at the sentencing hearing
  • “Because Banks had already received some benefit in exchange for his guilty plea, Banks was entitled to little, if any, mitigating weight for it at sentencing. Thus, we find that the trial court’s omission in this regard was harmless error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crone, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.