Peter Massaro v. Fairfax County

Oral argument

• Argued

  48 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court should have deemed 14 motion to dismiss moot after the complaint it applied to was amended
• stating that “[t]he Supreme Court noted that it ‘has rarely implied 14 a private right of action under a criminal statute’”
• adopting “anniversary method” for determining end of one-year period under analogous provision of 28 U.S.C. § 2255
• “Impairments that can be controlled effectively 14 with medication are not disabling for the purpose of determining eligibility for SSI 15 benefits.”
• “Impairments that can be controlled effectively 14 with medication are not disabling for the purpose of determining eligibility for 15 SSI benefits.”
• “An evidentiary rationale not raised before the trial judge at the time of ruling is waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).