Lorraine Lettieri v. Equant Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “other relevant evidence may be used to establish causation” where temporal proximity is missing
• holding that evidence of recurring retaliatory animus in intervening period between discrimination complaint and termination satisfied causation element of prima facie case of retaliation
• recognizing that “other relevant evidence may be used to establish causation” where temporal proximity is missing
• recognizing that “other relevant evidence may be used to establish causation” where temporal proximity is missing
• holding that “other relevant evidence may be used to establish causation” where temporal proximity is missing
• holding that the district court erred in granting summary judgment where there was sufficient evidence to show that the plaintiff was the victim of illegal retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).