Donna S. Jute v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp., Docket No. 04-3927-Cv

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant satisfied its burden of articulating legitimate non-retaliatory reasons to explain actionable claims of adverse employment action
• holding that being “poised to testify in support of a co-worker’s discrimination claims” constitutes protected activity under Title VID
• holding that volunteering to be a witness in a Title VII lawsuit constitutes protected activity
• holding that a plaintiff “participated” in a qualifying proceeding by offering to testify in another individual’s discrimination lawsuit, even though the plaintiff ultimately did not testify
• holding that an adverse employment action taken the same day, by an employer who was audibly enraged at the employee’s engagement in protected activity, suffices to show pretext
• holding that a retaliation claim based on a negative job reference claim was actionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).