Rhoads v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff was not substantially limited in her ability to work when the only thing she established was that she was “unable, to function in one particular smoke-infested office”
• assuming that employee provided adequate notice when she called her supervisor to inform him that she needed to take leave for a week
• noting that to sustain a claim for failure to accommodate, an employee has to show “that with reasonable accommodation he could perform the essential functions of the position”
• noting that “the plain language of the [FMLA] does not suggest that an employer must pursue [a second opinion] or be forever foreclosed from challenging whether an employee suffered from a serious health condition”
• stating that, to establish a prima facie failure-to-accommodate claim, a plaintiff must show “(1) that he was an individual who had a disability . . . ; (2) that the [employer] had notice of his disability; (3
• addressing the elements of a retaliation claim in a Rehabilitation Act and Americans with Disabilities Act case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).