Skip to main content

Fuller v. State

Citations

  • 540 So. 2d 182
  • 1989 WL 22563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “it [was] improper to personally attack defense counsel for cross-examining the child victim”
  • cumulative effect of the errors in child sexual abuse case was so fundamental as to require reversal
  • error to allow member of child protection team to testify that he believed the alleged child victim was telling the truth
  • “As a condition of admissibility, the statute [section 90.803(23)] requires that the court find that the time, content and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient safeguards of reliability and that the child either testifies or is unavailable as a witness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orfinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.