· 4/5/1985
State v. Myatt
Citations
- 697 P.2d 836
- 237 Kan. 17
- 1985 Kan. LEXIS 343
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- purpose of bill of particulars is to supplement allegation in indictment to preclude second prosecution for same offense
- statute with similar effect as NRS 51.385 held to be new, additional exception to hearsay rule
- statute with similar effect as NRS 51.385 held to be new, additional exception to hearsay rule
- “The problem with ‘stretching’ the existing exceptions in this manner is the destruction of the certainty and integrity of the exceptions.”
- \[T]he statute does not allow for admission of the hearsay statements of a child victim for the sole reason that the statement was made by a child.\
- \The venue of an offense is jurisdictional.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.