Skip to main content
· 4/5/1985

State v. Myatt

Citations

  • 697 P.2d 836
  • 237 Kan. 17
  • 1985 Kan. LEXIS 343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • purpose of bill of particulars is to supplement allegation in indictment to preclude second prosecution for same offense
  • statute with similar effect as NRS 51.385 held to be new, additional exception to hearsay rule
  • statute with similar effect as NRS 51.385 held to be new, additional exception to hearsay rule
  • “The problem with ‘stretching’ the existing exceptions in this manner is the destruction of the certainty and integrity of the exceptions.”
  • \[T]he statute does not allow for admission of the hearsay statements of a child victim for the sole reason that the statement was made by a child.\
  • \The venue of an offense is jurisdictional.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.