Skip to main content

State v. Contreras

Citations

  • 979 So. 2d 896
  • 2008 WL 657867

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[i]n Crawford, the Supreme Court dispensed with the Roberts reliability analysis”
  • holding videotaped interview with Child Protection Team coordinator at domestic violence victim's shelter when detective was in adjoining room and able to electronically suggest questions to interviewer was testimonial
  • holding videotaped interview with Child Protection Team coordinator at domestic violence victim's shelter when detective was in adjoining room and able to electronically suggest questions to interviewer was testimonial
  • holding statements child victim made to member of child protection team testimonial in nature
  • “[A] deposition that is taken pursuant to rule 3.220 is only admissible for purposes of impeachment and not as substantive evidence.”
  • “[A] deposition that is taken pursuant to rule 3.220 is only admissible for purposes of impeachment and not as substantive evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.