Ninth Circuit· 2/21/2002
Perez-Arellano v. Smith
Citations
- 279 F.3d 791
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Buckhannon applies to a motion for attorney’s fees under the EAJA
- two judicial 9 outcomes for “prevailing party” status include (1) an enforceable judgment on the merits 10 or (2) a court-ordered consent decree.
- Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)
- applying the Buckhannon definition of “prevailing party” to the EAJA
- applying Buckhannon’s definition of “prevailing party” to the EAJA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Poland v. ChertoffNinth Circuit· 2007-07-20· cited 289×
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Department of EnergyD.C. Circuit· 2002-05-10· cited 125×
- Thomas v. National Science FoundationD.C. Circuit· 2003-06-03· cited 98×
- Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia CountyEleventh Circuit· 2002-09-30· cited 52×
- United States v. Joel EsquenaziEleventh Circuit· 2014-05-16· cited 33×
- Mirta Morillo-Cedron v. District Director for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesEleventh Circuit· 2006-06-21· cited 23×
- Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Department of AgricultureNinth Circuit· 2009-06-09· cited 17×
- Kasza v. WhitmanNinth Circuit· 2003-04-14· cited 15×
- Association of California Water Agencies v. EvansNinth Circuit· 2004-09-24· cited 7×
- Carbonell v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2005-11-17· cited 6×
- Doe v. Boston Public SchoolsD. Massachusetts· 2003-05-20· cited 5×
- Orantes-Hernandez v. HolderC.D. California· 2010-03-29· cited 5×
- Elliott v. U.S. Dep't of StateS.D. New York· 2015-07-23· cited 5×
- Nutrivita Laboratories, Inc. v. VBS Distribution Inc.C.D. California· 2016-01-27· cited 4×
- Aboushaban v. MuellerN.D. California· 2007-02-23· cited 3×
- United States v. Real Property at 2659 Roundhill Drive, Alamo, CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2002-03-18· cited 3×
- Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. NapolitanoE.D. California· 2011-11-15· cited 3×
- Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. GutierrezD. Oregon· 2006-08-07· cited 2×
- Murgolo v. AstrueNinth Circuit· 2007-11-15· cited 2×
- Feezor v. Lopez De-JesusS.D. California· 2006-05-02· cited 1×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,075×
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 1,755×
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-05-23· cited 635×
- Victor Barrios v. California Interscholastic Federation California Interscholastic Federation Opinion Southern SectionNinth Circuit· 2002-01-16· cited 148×
- Perez-Arellano v. SmithNinth Circuit· 2002-02-01· cited 123×
- Citizens Coalition for Block Grant Compliance, Inc. v. City of Euclid, United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentSixth Circuit· 1983-09-20· cited 44×
- Thayer v. PrincipiVeterans Claims· 2001-09-04· cited 43×
- Douglas COUPAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR), RespondentsNinth Circuit· 1997-01-30· cited 14×
- Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2001-06-29· cited 11×
- Heeren v. City of JamestownSixth Circuit· 1994-10-25· cited 8×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bassam SOUEITI, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1998-09-02· cited 7×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bassam SOUEITI, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1998-12-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.