Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 2/21/2002

Perez-Arellano v. Smith

Citations

  • 279 F.3d 791

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Buckhannon applies to a motion for attorney’s fees under the EAJA
  • two judicial 9 outcomes for “prevailing party” status include (1) an enforceable judgment on the merits 10 or (2) a court-ordered consent decree.
  • Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)
  • applying the Buckhannon definition of “prevailing party” to the EAJA
  • applying Buckhannon’s definition of “prevailing party” to the EAJA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.