Skip to main content
· 1/16/2002

Victor Barrios v. California Interscholastic Federation California Interscholastic Federation Opinion Southern Section

Citations

  • 277 F.3d 1128
  • 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1145
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 579
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 421
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 673
  • 2002 WL 54635

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a settlement agreement contained sufficient judicial oversight to confer prevailing-party status
  • holding that a settlement agreement contained sufficient judicial oversight to confer prevailing-party status
  • determining that plaintiff who could enforce settlement agreement against defendants was a prevailing party under the ADA
  • reversing denial of attorneys’ fees because plaintiff was “prevailing party” under Section 55 given that settlement agreement gave plaintiff access to the baseball field and $10,000
  • \Any elements of legal analysis and statutory interpretation that figure in the district court's attorneys' fees decision are reviewed de novo.\
  • “Any elements of legal analysis and statutory interpretation that figure in the district court’s attorneys’ fees decision are reviewed de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Tashima, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.