Skip to main content
· 9/30/2002

Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia County

Citations

  • 307 F.3d 1318
  • 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20057
  • 55 ERC (BNA) 1161
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we interpret \substantially prevailed\ fee-shifting statutes consistently with \prevailing party\ fee-shifting statutes
  • observing that the Eleventh Circuit interprets “substantially prevailed” consistently with “prevailing party”
  • asserting that variations in terminology “are generally deemed inconsequential”
  • asserting that variations in terminology “are generally deemed inconsequential”
  • “[C]itizen suits under the ESA may only seek equitable relief; damages are not available.”
  • differences in language “are generally deemed inconsequential”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Birch, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.