· 9/30/2002
Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia County
Citations
- 307 F.3d 1318
- 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20057
- 55 ERC (BNA) 1161
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20705
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that we interpret \substantially prevailed\ fee-shifting statutes consistently with \prevailing party\ fee-shifting statutes
- observing that the Eleventh Circuit interprets “substantially prevailed” consistently with “prevailing party”
- asserting that variations in terminology “are generally deemed inconsequential”
- asserting that variations in terminology “are generally deemed inconsequential”
- “[C]itizen suits under the ESA may only seek equitable relief; damages are not available.”
- differences in language “are generally deemed inconsequential”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Birch, Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.