Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 2/1/2002

Perez-Arellano v. Smith

Citations

  • 279 F.3d 791
  • 2002 WL 130426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Buckhannon rule governs an application for fees under the EAJA
  • noting that Buckhannon “sweeps . . . broadly and its reasoning is per- suasively applicable to an award of attorney’s fees under the EAJA”
  • applying Buckhannon analysis to Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gould, Graber, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Perez-Arellano v. Smith

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.