Ninth Circuit· 2/1/2002
Perez-Arellano v. Smith
Citations
- 279 F.3d 791
- 2002 WL 130426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Buckhannon rule governs an application for fees under the EAJA
- noting that Buckhannon “sweeps . . . broadly and its reasoning is per- suasively applicable to an award of attorney’s fees under the EAJA”
- applying Buckhannon analysis to Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gould, Graber, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- America Cargo Transport, Inc. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2010-11-05· cited 296×
- Poland v. ChertoffNinth Circuit· 2007-07-20· cited 289×
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Department of EnergyD.C. Circuit· 2002-05-10· cited 125×
- Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementNinth Circuit· 2009-12-15· cited 98×
- Carbonell v. I.N.S.Ninth Circuit· 2005-11-18· cited 95×
- United States v. ChapmanNinth Circuit· 2008-05-06· cited 95×
- Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2002-05-03· cited 83×
- Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees, Afl-Cio, Clc v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSecond Circuit· 2003-07-16· cited 81×
- Jianping Li v. KeislerNinth Circuit· 2007-09-27· cited 60×
- Dalip Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-10-21· cited 49×
- Ungar v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationFirst Circuit· 2005-03-31· cited 48×
- United States v. MilnerNinth Circuit· 2009-10-09· cited 46×
- Perez-Arellano v. SmithNinth Circuit· 2002-02-21· cited 40×
- Ma v. Chertoff Ex Rel. United States Department of Homeland SecuritySecond Circuit· 2008-11-04· cited 23×
- Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Department of AgricultureNinth Circuit· 2009-06-09· cited 17×
- Whitney Ford Rodney Ford v. Long Beach Unified School DistrictNinth Circuit· 2006-08-23· cited 16×
- Iqbal v. HolderTenth Circuit· 2012-08-21· cited 9×
- Kholyavskiy v. SchlechtE.D. Wisconsin· 2007-02-09· cited 5×
- Citizens for Better v. US Dept. of AgricultureN.D. California· 2007-04-17· cited 4×
- Environmental Protection Information Center, Inc. v. Pacific Lumber Co.N.D. California· 2002-09-19· cited 4×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,075×
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 1,755×
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-05-23· cited 635×
- Citizens Coalition for Block Grant Compliance, Inc. v. City of Euclid, United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentSixth Circuit· 1983-09-20· cited 44×
- Thayer v. PrincipiVeterans Claims· 2001-09-04· cited 43×
- Douglas COUPAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR), RespondentsNinth Circuit· 1997-01-30· cited 14×
- Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2001-06-29· cited 11×
- Heeren v. City of JamestownSixth Circuit· 1994-10-25· cited 8×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bassam SOUEITI, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1998-09-02· cited 7×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bassam SOUEITI, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1998-12-23· cited 3×
Other cases named Perez-Arellano v. Smith
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.