Mirta Morillo-Cedron v. District Director for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court erred in awarding fees and costs after dismissing the case as moot
• stating that “‘a prevailing party’ is one who has been awarded some relief by the court”
• finding that plaintiffs were not the prevailing party where “[t]he Government voluntarily processed their [lawful permanent residency] applications and conducted interviews before the district court entered any final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).