Supreme Court of Colorado· 7/9/1991

People v. Young

Citations

814 P.2d 834
15 Brief Times Rptr. 927
1991 Colo. LEXIS 452
1991 WL 123096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

treating such appeals as appeals from final judgments and not interlocutory appeals, although not addressing the issue of toEing of the speedy trial statute
treating such appeals as appeals from final judgments and not interlocutory appeals, although not addressing the issue of tolling of the speedy trial statute
finding original jurisdiction appropriate as the case was the first request for appellate review of the constitutionality of the 1988 amendments to the death penalty statute
which I agree with Justice Davis misreads the Arizona sentencing scheme and relies upon the Colorado Constitution
which I agree with Justice Davis misreads the Arizona sentencing scheme and relies upon the Colorado Constitution
“[W]e are attentive to the Supreme Court’s reasoning, especially because the cruel and unusual punishments clause in the two constitutions is the same.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickson, Kirshbaum, Lohr, Mullarkey, Only, Quinn, Rovira, Vollack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.