Skip to main content

People v. Young

Citations

  • 340 N.W.2d 805
  • 418 Mich. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court erred by not holding a Davis-Frye hearing to determine whether an expert’s testimony had achieved general scientific acceptance
  • “The Davis-Frye standard is the means by which the court can determine that the novel evidence offered for admission here enjoys such recognition.”
  • \The Davis-Frye standard is the means by which the court can determine that the novel evidence offered for admission here enjoys such recognition.\
  • “The Davis-Frye standard is the means by which the court can determine that the novel evidence offered for admission here enjoys such recognition.”
  • “The Davis-Frye standard is the means by which the court can determine that the novel evidence offered for admission here enjoys such recognition.”
  • “The Davis-Frye standard is the means by which the court can determine that the novel evidence offered for admission here enjoys such recognition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyle, Williams, Kavanagh, Levin, Ryan, Brickley, Cavanagh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.