Supreme Court of Colorado· 9/10/1999
People v. Williams
Citations
- 984 P.2d 56
- 1999 WL 431174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- omission of ulterior crime from information charging first degree criminal trespass was only a defect in form
- defects in the form of an information do not require reversal unless the substantial rights of the defendant are prejudiced
- \[T]he information set forth all essential elements of the crime of first degree criminal trespass.\
- an information is sufficient when it provides defendant notice of the factual circumstances surrounding the offense so that he can adequately defend himself
- although the information did not identify the offense underlying a charge of criminal trespass, the defendant was not entitled to relief because he failed to request a bill of particulars and failed to show that he had been prejudiced
- in a burglary charge, failure to allege underlying offense is not substantive error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hobbs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-07-03· cited 552×
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2020-06-08· cited 495×
- Montez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2012-02-13· cited 343×
- People v. MelilloSupreme Court of Colorado· 2001-05-29· cited 267×
- People v. CarlsonColorado Court of Appeals· 2003-02-13· cited 198×
- People v. RussellColorado Court of Appeals· 2001-02-15· cited 197×
- People v. MadisonColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-05-03· cited 182×
- People v. PahlColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-08-24· cited 91×
- People v. RiceColorado Court of Appeals· 2008-05-15· cited 77×
- Copeland v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-06-12· cited 62×
- People v. MaddenSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-04-18· cited 60×
- v. CurtisColorado Court of Appeals· 2021-08-17· cited 59×
- People v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-12-23· cited 56×
- People v. RichardsonColorado Court of Appeals· 2002-02-14· cited 49×
- People v. SalyerColorado Court of Appeals· 2003-02-13· cited 45×
- People v. GardnerColorado Court of Appeals· 2010-03-04· cited 32×
- Medina v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2007-07-02· cited 28×
- Sanchez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2014-05-12· cited 18×
- Lujan-Jimenez v. SessionsTenth Circuit· 2018-06-19· cited 17×
- State v. SemancikAlaska Supreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 16×
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 2,897×
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 1,715×
- People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-04-15· cited 1,618×
- People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 794×
- United States v. CarllSupreme Court· 1882-04-24· cited 453×
- People v. MackeyNew York Court of Appeals· 1980-01-10· cited 200×
- State v. WatersSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-28· cited 105×
- State v. BerryhillMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-10-23· cited 103×
- State v. LoraSupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-11-03· cited 86×
- United States v. Roy L. Thomas, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1971-04-26· cited 81×
- People v. MorenoSupreme Court of Colorado· 1971-12-13· cited 76×
- Cooper v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-02-22· cited 59×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Arthur PembertonThird Circuit· 1987-03-13· cited 55×
- Stwalley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-02-20· cited 52×
- People v. AlboSupreme Court of Colorado· 1978-03-06· cited 47×
- Cervantes v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-03-17· cited 42×
- Chambers v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-05-21· cited 40×
- State v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-07-13· cited 37×
- Erickson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1998-01-20· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.