Tenth Circuit· 6/19/2018

Lujan-Jimenez v. Sessions

Citations

893 F.3d 704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that dicta in two state appellate opinions did not definitively resolve whether the alternatives constituted elements or means
concluding that dicta in two state appellate opinions did not definitively resolve whether the alternatives constituted elements or means
holding that a conviction under the Colorado first-degree criminal trespass statute is not categorically a CIMT because the statute is indivisible as to the particular “ulterior offense” (i.e., underlying crime
holding that we are no longer bound by circuit precedent “when the Supreme Court issues an intervening decision that is contrary to or invalidates our previous analysis” (internal quotation marks omitted)
dismissing petition for review of Board order declining to reopen sua sponte
internal quotation marks, citation, and “exceptional circumstances” test for sua sponte reopening

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Lucero, Bacharach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.