Skip to main content

People v. Warrick

Citations

  • 284 P.3d 139
  • 2011 WL 5089464
  • 2011 Colo. App. LEXIS 1745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a police officer’s testimony that a crime was a felony under a statute wasn’t an opinion where the officer didn’t express any “view, judgment, or appraisal” on the statute’s applicability or meaning
  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that a law enforcement officer gave improper opinion testimony, in part because the testimony “probably was not an ‘opinion’ in the first instance”
  • booking reports and mittimus admitted in trial for possession of weapon by a previous offender were not testimonial because they were created for routine administrative purposes and not to establish a material fact at any future criminal proceeding
  • no plain error in allowing officer to testify as lay witness about lie detection techniques, where officer was qualified to offer such testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loeb, Richman, Terry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Warrick

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.