People v. Crespi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court should admit physical evidence if a reasonable jury could decide that it is what the proponent claims it to be
• whether a proper foundation for authentication has been established is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court
• jury could infer from the defendant’s letter that she was involved in manufacturing methamphetamine, even though it “did not specify an exact time or place and did not make explicit reference to controlled substances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).