Lifewise Master Funding v. Telebank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant waived right to appeal district court rulings that it did not substantively address in its opening brief
• interpreting promise that funding recipient would not “create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any Lien” on described property as prohibiting recipient from allowing any future liens
• noting “damages model” 11 involved “technical, specialized subjects” where model “concerned moving 12 averages, compounded growth rates, and S-curves”
• preventing corporate president from offering valuation testimony supporting damages model because it “concerned moving averages, compounded growth rates, and S-curves”
• classifying “moving averages, compounded growth rates, and S-curves” to be too technical for lay witness testimony
• president of the company could not testify to lost profits using a damages model outside his knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).