Illinois Supreme Court· 3/23/1988

People v. Esposito

Citations

521 N.E.2d 873
121 Ill. 2d 491
118 Ill. Dec. 396
1988 Ill. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding the 45-day time delay to be significant because the statutory scheme only requires that trial court conduct a hearing on a petition to rescind within 30 days, as opposed to within some shorter time frame
finding the 45-day time delay to be significant because the statutory scheme only requires that trial court conduct a hearing on a petition to rescind within 30 days, as opposed to within some shorter time frame
implied-consent concept and the statutory summary suspension procedure were intended to protect the public, not to punish the licensee
summary suspension of driver’s license for refusing to take test for BAC and for BAC of .10 or greater was “intended to protect the public, not to punish the licensee”
implied-consent concept and the statutory summary suspension procedure were intended to protect the public, not to punish the licensee
drivers whose blood-alcohol content is 0.10% or more and those whose blood-alcohol content falls below that mark are not so similarly situated as to require identical treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Esposito

48 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.