People v. Boand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the drug-induced-homicide statute is satisfied by showing that the death was proximately caused by the delivery of the controlled substance
• finding that the court should not have instructed the jury to consider other-crimes evidence for the purpose of - 19 - No. 1-16-1666 identity where identity was not at issue at trial
• affirming trial court decision to allow two prior victims to testify, but not discussing quantity of evidence
• improper cross-examination is not reversible error where it can be considered harmless error (citing People v. Enis, 139 Ill. 2d 264, 296 (1990))
• improper cross-examination is not reversible error where it can be considered harmless error (citing People v. Enis, 139 Ill. 2d 264, 296 (1990)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).