Appellate Court of Illinois· 10/17/2006

People v. Ford

Citations

857 N.E.2d 871
368 Ill. App. 3d 271
306 Ill. Dec. 472
2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

no remand was necessary where “defendant’s allegations were facially insufficient” and trial court “considered” defendant’s allegations “as they arose”
no posttrial inquiry by the trial court was necessary where defendant’s pro se complaints about his trial counsel were facially insufficient and set forth in a general and conclusory manner
“record shows that the court considered defendant’s allegations” and made a determination “in essence”
remand for further inquiry was not necessary where the defendant’s allegations were facially insufficient; set forth in a general and conclusory manner; and contradicted by other allegations, facts on record, and the prosecutor
no posttrial inquiry by the trial court was necessary where defendant's pro se complaints about his trial counsel were facially insufficient and set forth in a general and conclusory manner
“The record shows that the court considered defendant’s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel as they arose and determined, in essence, that defendant did not bring forth a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: South

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.