Skip to main content

People v. Rojas

Citations

  • 181 P.3d 1216
  • 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 354
  • 2008 WL 597656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that child’s statements were sufficiently reliable where they were made in response to nonleading, open-ended questions, in age-appropriate language, with no evidence of bias, and victim “made substantially similar statements to more than one person”
  • “Closing argument must be confined to the evidence admitted at trial, the inferences that can reasonably and fairly be drawn from it, and the instructions of law submitted to the jury.”
  • “[T]he fact that not all the relevant factors support admissibility does not require exclusion of the statements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogt, Dailey, Furman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.