Ninth Circuit· 9/5/2007

United States v. Mitchell

Citations

502 F.3d 931
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21201
2007 WL 2482077

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that testimony was “not so plainly inflam- matory that it should have been excluded sua sponte”
holding that “in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt” it could not “possibly have been plain error, in the absence of a motion to strike,” for the district court to allow7 the testimony
holding that the Government could introduce evidence about Navajo religious tradition to show that a murder victim’s family no longer had access to its primary source of religious knowledge
holding that “in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt” it could not “possibly have been plain error, in the absence of a motion to strike,” for the district court to allow the testimony
noting that enacted statutes have given the federal government limited jurisdiction over certain UNITED STATES V. JAMES 7 major crimes committed on Native American land
recognizing 22 that the Supreme Court “drew this line well aware of the ‘objections always raised 23 against categorical rules[.]’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, Rymer, Silverman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

224 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.