Skip to main content

People v. Marks

Citations

  • 2015 COA 173
  • 374 P.3d 518
  • 2015 Colo. App. LEXIS 1855
  • 2015 WL 7769092

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • highlighting the significant impact that DNA evidence has on juries: \so much so that the evidence has long enjoyed a status of mythic infallibility for juries\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • highlighting the significant impact that DNA evidence has on juries: \so much so that the evidence has long enjoyed a status of mythic infallibility for juries\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “A defendant must admit to having engaged in the proscribed conduct to be entitled to an entrapment instruction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Taubman, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.