Skip to main content

People v. Rodriguez

Citations

  • 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 295
  • 16 Cal. App. 5th 355
  • 2017 WL 4683887
  • 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that GPS data generated from defendant’s ankle monitor was not hearsay because it was not a statement of a person
  • holding that a “computer-generated report of . . . GPS data . . . did not consist of statements of a person . . . and did not constitute hearsay”
  • holding GPS coordinates automatically generated from defendant’s ankle monitor not hearsay under California Evidence Code because “there was ‘no statement being made by a person’”
  • holding GPS coordinates automatically generated from defendant’s ankle monitor not hearsay under California Evidence Code because “there was ‘no statement being made by a person’”
  • holding GPS data generated by defendant’s ankle monitor was not hearsay under California Evidence Code because it was not a statement of a person and was reliable
  • “The computer- generated report of the GPS data generated by defendant’s ankle monitor did not consist of statements of a person as defined by the Evidence Code, and did not constitute hearsay as statutorily defined”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poochigian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.