United States v. Paciano Lizarraga-Tirado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Google-Earth-generated evidence could be authenticated by “a witness who frequently works with and relies on the program”
• “A tack 38 placed by the Google Earth program and automatically labeled with GPS coordinates isn’t hearsay.”
• location markers generated - 24 - on image by Google Earth are not hearsay because Google Earth is not \a person\
• “A proponent must show that a machine is reliable and correctly calibrated, and that the data put into the machine is accurate.”
• “Because the program makes the relevant assertion. . . there's no statement as defined by the hearsay rule. In reaching that conclusion, we join other circuits that have held that machine statements aren't hearsay.”
• \[W]e join other circuits that have held that machine statements aren't hearsay.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).