United States v. Angela Khorozian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an automatically generated time-stamp on a fax was not a hearsay statement because it was not uttered by a person
• holding date stamp on fax not hearsay because, under Federal Rules of Evidence, a “statement” is something “uttered by a ‘person,’ so nothing ‘said’ by a machine is hearsay”
• finding no abuse of discretion in the denial of a continuance for a witness to appear for trial where “defense counsel essentially conceded that [the witness] would not be an essential witness”
• ‘“Authentication does not conclusively establish the genuineness of an item; it is a foundation that a jury may reject.”
• header of fax bearing the transmission date was not hearsay because, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, “a statement is something uttered by ‘a person’ [and thus,] nothing ‘said’ by a machine . . . is hearsay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).