Skip to main content
· 10/21/1993

People v. Edgeston

Citations

  • 623 N.E.2d 329
  • 157 Ill. 2d 201
  • 191 Ill. Dec. 84
  • 1993 Ill. LEXIS 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding of fifth amendment privilege was “not an abuse of trial court’s discretion”
  • court found that witness could raise fifth amendment protection where question could jeopardize any collateral attack on his guilty plea
  • court found that witness could raise fifth amendment protection where question could jeopardize any collateral attack on his guilty plea
  • despite guilty plea, real danger of incrimination remained, allowing accomplice to assert privilege against self-incrimination in defendant’s trial because accomplice intended to collaterally challenge his guilty plea and renege on plea agreement
  • counsel under no duty to make meritless arguments
  • counsel under no duty to make meritless arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.