Skip to main content

People v. Raney

Citations

  • 756 N.E.2d 338
  • 324 Ill. App. 3d 703
  • 258 Ill. Dec. 356
  • 2001 Ill. App. LEXIS 658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • testimony based on results from GCMS machine not admissible without foundation evidence that machine was functioning properly
  • proper foundation was lacking where expert failed to provide any testimony that the machine used was calibrated and working properly or how she knew the results were accurate
  • proper foundation was lacking where expert failed to provide any testimony that the machine used was calibrated and working properly or how she knew the results were accurate
  • testimony based on results from GCMS machine not admissible without foundation evidence that machine was functioning properly
  • proper foundation was lacking where expert failed to provide any testimony that the machine used was calibrated and working properly or how she knew the results were accurate
  • expert did not testify about the accuracy of the testing equipment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frossard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Raney

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.