People v. Rials

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• counsel “need not scour the record to ascertain any other potential errors and constitutional issues not implicated in the defendant’s pro se petition” (emphasis added)
• “A defendant may not raise for the first time on appeal constitutional claims which were not actually presented in his petition”
• “ ‘[P]ostconviction counsel is not required to comb the record for issues not raised in the defendant’s pro se post-conviction petition.’ ”
• “ ‘[P]ostconviction counsel is not required to comb the record for issues not raised in the defendant’s pro se post-conviction petition.’ ”
• \A defendant may not raise for the first time on appeal constitutional claims which were not actually presented in his petition\
• \ '[P]ostconviction counsel is not required to comb the record for issues not raised in the defendant's pro se postconviction petition.' \ (quoting People v. Helton, 321 Ill. App. 3d 420, 424-25 (2001)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).