Illinois Supreme Court· 7/15/2010

People v. Williams

Citations

939 N.E.2d 268
238 Ill. 2d 125
345 Ill. Dec. 425
2010 Ill. LEXIS 971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that expert “testimony about Cellmark’s report was not admitted for the truth of the matter asserted” but, “rather, to show the underlying facts and data [the expert] used before rendering” her opinion
observing that, in 1981, the Illinois Supreme Court had adopted the identical Rule 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence
observing that in Wilson v. Clark, 84 Ill. 2d 186 (1981), the Illinois Supreme Court had adopted the identical Rule 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence
observing that in Wilson v. Clark, 84 Ill. 2d 186 (1981), the Illinois Supreme Court had adopted the identical Rule 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence
observing that in Wilson v. Clark, 84 Ill. 2d 186 (1981), the Illinois Supreme Court had adopted the identical Rule 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence
observing that in Wilson v. Clark, 84 Ill. 2d 186 (1981), the Illinois Supreme Court had adopted the identical Rule 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald, Freeman, Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.