Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/30/2009

People v. Johnson

Citations

906 N.E.2d 70
389 Ill. App. 3d 618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that an expert’s testimony about a DNA match was “overwhelming” evidence
finding that an expert’s testimony about a DNA match was “overwhelming” evidence
“[A]pproximately 10 Cellmark analysts were involved in the laboratory work in this case”
“[Approximately 10 Cellmark analysts were involved in the laboratory work in this case”
“[f]aced with overwhelming DNA evidence, the defense in this sexual assault *** case attempted to persuade the jury” that he did not force the victim
“[A]pproximately 10 Cellmark analysts were involved in the laboratory work in this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.