Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 1/14/2004

People v. Peco

Citations

  • 803 N.E.2d 561
  • 345 Ill. App. 3d 724
  • 281 Ill. Dec. 157
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “while no magic words are required to constitute a speedy-trial demand, there must be some affirmative statement requesting a speedy trial in the record” (emphasis added)
  • “while no magic words are required to constitute a speedy-trial demand, there must be some affirmative statement requesting a speedy trial in the record” (emphasis added)
  • “while no magic words are required to constitute a speedy- trial demand, there must be some affirmative statement requesting a speedy trial in the record” (emphasis added)
  • counsel not ineffective for failing to raise an unmeritorious posttrial claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grometer, Byrne, Kapala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Peco

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.