Skip to main content

People v. Ladd

Citations

  • 708 N.E.2d 359
  • 185 Ill. 2d 602
  • 236 Ill. Dec. 773
  • 1999 Ill. LEXIS 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant’s motion to discharge that did not delay proceedings was not chargeable to defendant, while a specific request for a continuance to research a motion to discharge was attributed to defendant
  • holding defendant's motion to discharge that did not delay proceedings was not chargeable to defendant, while a specific request for a continuance to research a motion to discharge was attributed to defendant
  • declining to address the effect of Public Act 90 — 705 on section 103 — 5(a)
  • computing the speedy trial term involves excluding the first day and including the last
  • declining to address the effect of Public Act 90--705 on section 103--5(a)
  • in calculating the speedy-trial period, the court must exclude the first day and include the last day

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Rathje, Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.