Skip to main content

Compton v. Ubilluz

Citations

  • 811 N.E.2d 1225
  • 285 Ill. Dec. 346
  • 351 Ill. App. 3d 223
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 765

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that section 2-616(d) should be interpreted in manner that would \lead to a resolution on the merits\
  • noting that section 2-616(d) should be interpreted in manner that would \lead to a resolution on the merits\
  • a statute should not be construed so as to render any portion of it meaningless
  • a statute should not be construed so as to render any portion of it meaningless
  • a statute should not be construed so as to render any portion of it meaningless
  • “If the amended complaint is filed after the effective date of the amendment to the statute [and] ... the limitation period of the original complaint has lapsed, then the unamended version of section 2-616 will apply....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Malley, Bowman, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.