People v. Althide

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, because the defendant’s statement to police was involuntary, “[w]e deal here not merely with a violation of the ‘prophylactic rules’ designed to protect a defendant’s right against self-incrimination, but with a violation of that constitutional right itself’
• rejecting proposition that request for a jury trial constitutes a speedy-trial demand
• rejecting proposition that request for a jury trial constitutes a speedy-trial demand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).